The article goes on to highlight some of the many faith-based initiatives supported by the Bush administration--all of which, because they are mired in ignorance, have failed miserably. I can appreciate an individual's need for faith, but let's adopt faith-based solutions only when reason- and science-based solutions are unavailable. Public values should be defined by public dialogue and debate, thorugh negotiation and compromise; not dictated by unapproachable authorities.The right wing in America likes to think that the United States government was, at its inception, highly religious, specifically highly Christian, and even more specifically highly biblical. That was not true of that government or any later government--until 2000, when the fiction of the past became the reality of the present. George W. Bush was not only born-again, like Jimmy Carter. His religious conversion came late, and took place in the political setting of Billy Graham's ministry to the powerful. He was converted during a stroll with Graham on his father's Kennebunkport compound. It is true that Dwight Eisenhower was guided to baptism by Graham. But Eisenhower was a famous and formed man, the principal military figure of World War II, the leader of NATO, the president of Columbia University--his change in religious orientation was just an addition to many prior achievements. Bush's conversion at a comparatively young stage in his life was a wrenching away from mainly wasted years. He joined a Bible study culture in Texas that was unlike anything Eisenhower bought into.
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
In the recent New York Review of Books, Gary Wills writes a nice overview fof the mess that results from the infusion of religion into our political life.
Facebook me!
Comments
Add Comment