Skip to main content.

Friday, August 19, 2005

Amanda Schaffer in a Slate article presents a useful overview of the main lines of critique of Evolutionary Psychology.
Evolutionary psychologists have long taken heat from critics for overplaying innate characteristics--nature at the expense of nurture--and for reinforcing gender stereotypes. But they've dismissed many detractors, fairly or no, as softheaded feminists and sociologists who refuse to acknowledge the true power of natural selection. Increasingly, however, attacks on EP come from academics well-versed in the hard-nosed details of evolutionary biology.
There are useful references to David Buller's book Adapting Minds and Kim Sterelney's Thought in a Hostile World. I learned of the article form Minds Hacks, who also point us to Jerry Fodor's TLS review of Buller.

Cave Thinkers: How evolutionary psychology gets evolution wrong.

Comments

No comments yet

Add Comment

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it

TrackBack