Skip to main content.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

In the recent Scientific American article Michael Shermer discusses moral decision making and, referring to Read Montague's new book Why Choose This Book?, the neuroscience of choice. Shermer argues that
we evolved moral emotions that operate similarly to other emotions, such as hunger and sexual appetite. Thinking of these emotions as proxies for highly efficient computational programs deepens our understanding of the process. When we need energy, we do not compute the relative caloric values of our food choices; we just feel hungry, eat and are rewarded with a sense of satisfaction. Likewise, in choosing a sexual partner, the brain employs a computational program to make you feel attracted to people with good genes, as indicated by such proxies as a symmetrical face and body, clear complexion, and a 0.7 to 1 waist-to-hip ratio in women and an inverted pyramid build in men. Similarly, in making moral choices about whether to be altruistic or selfish, we feel guilt or pride for having done the wrong or right thing. But the moral calculations of what is best for the individual and the social group were made by our Paleolithic ancestors. Emotions such as hunger, lust and pride are stand-ins for such computations.
Free to Choose: Scientific American

Comments

No comments yet

Add Comment

This item is closed, it's not possible to add new comments to it or to vote on it

TrackBack